Chapter 11 of 15
How to Value a Stock (DCF)
Discounted Cash Flow — finding intrinsic value.
Priya had shortlisted three companies she admired fundamentally. But all three seemed expensive based on their current P/E ratios. Her mentor introduced her to DCF — Discounted Cash Flow analysis. "The stock market gives you a vote every day," her mentor said, quoting Benjamin Graham, "but it gives you a weighing machine over the long term. DCF is how you figure out what a business actually weighs."
What Is Intrinsic Value?
How DCF Works — The Steps
- Estimate current Free Cash Flow (FCF): FCF = Operating Cash Flow − Capital Expenditure
- Project FCF growth: Estimate how rapidly FCF will grow for the next 5–10 years
- Choose a discount rate (WACC): Typically 10–14% for Indian large-cap stocks
- Calculate Terminal Value: The value of all cash flows beyond your projection period
- Discount everything to present value
- Sum all present values to get the company's intrinsic value
- Apply margin of safety before deciding to buy
A quality FMCG company currently generates ₹100 crore in Free Cash Flow (FCF). Assumptions:
- FCF grows at 15% per year for 5 years (high growth phase)
- Terminal growth rate after Year 5: 7% (steady state, near nominal GDP growth)
- WACC (discount rate): 12%
- Year 1: ₹100 × 1.15 = ₹115 crore → PV = ₹115 / 1.12 = ₹102.7 crore
- Year 2: ₹132.25 crore → PV = ₹105.5 crore
- Year 3: ₹152.09 crore → PV = ₹108.3 crore
- Year 4: ₹174.90 crore → PV = ₹111.1 crore
- Year 5: ₹201.14 crore → PV = ₹114.1 crore
- Sum of PV of FCF (Years 1–5): ~₹541 crore
Terminal Value = FCF at Year 5 × (1 + Terminal Growth) / (WACC − Terminal Growth) = ₹201.14 × 1.07 / (0.12 − 0.07) = ₹215.22 / 0.05 = ₹4,304 crore
Present Value of Terminal Value = ₹4,304 / (1.12)^5 = ₹4,304 / 1.762 = ₹2,443 crore Step 3 — Total Intrinsic Value:
₹541 + ₹2,443 = ₹2,984 crore ≈ ₹3,000 crore
If the company has 10 crore shares outstanding, intrinsic value per share = ₹3,000 / 10 = ₹300 per share. With a 25% margin of safety, you'd want to buy below ₹225 per share.
In the example above, changing the growth rate from 15% to 18% increases intrinsic value by over 40%. Changing WACC from 12% to 10% similarly inflates the value dramatically. DCF outputs are only as good as the inputs — "garbage in, garbage out." Use DCF as one input among several, not as a precise calculator of truth.
DCF vs P/E vs P/B — When to Use What
| Method | Best Used For | Limitation | Indian Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | Mature companies with predictable cash flows; long-term intrinsic value | Very sensitive to growth and discount rate assumptions | Suitable for HUL, TCS, Asian Paints |
| P/E Ratio | Quick comparison within a sector; relative valuation | Earnings can be manipulated; distorted by one-time items | Compare Infosys P/E vs TCS P/E vs Wipro P/E |
| P/B Ratio | Banks and financial companies (asset-heavy) | Meaningless for asset-light businesses (IT, software) | HDFC Bank P/B = 3×, SBI P/B = 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | Capital-intensive sectors, comparing across capital structures | Requires adjusting for leases and capex | Telecom (Jio, Airtel), cement, steel |
Even if your DCF analysis suggests a company's intrinsic value is ₹500, buy only at ₹350–₹400 (30% margin of safety). This protects you against being too optimistic in your projections. Graham recommended at least a 33% margin of safety; Buffett and Munger look for businesses so fundamentally excellent that even without a DCF, the margin of safety is built into the quality.
What does 'Margin of Safety' mean in the context of stock investing?
Key Takeaways
- DCF estimates a company's intrinsic value by discounting future free cash flows back to present value using a discount rate (WACC).
- DCF is extremely assumption-sensitive — small changes in growth rate or WACC dramatically change the output; always stress-test your assumptions.
- The Margin of Safety (buy below intrinsic value by 20–30%+) protects investors from valuation errors and unforeseen business setbacks.
- Use DCF alongside relative valuation (P/E, P/B) — no single method is perfect, but convergence across multiple methodologies increases confidence.